Thursday, March 31, 2011
Friday, March 4, 2011
Alloscythian
Okay. I give up on Sundays. Let's just go randomly.
The Alloscythian (other Scythes) language is a conlang that I did a while ago. It is a descendant of PIE, a relatively conservative Satem language, with most changes having affected vowel features (nasals and tone).
Here are some example words:
θὲσσου (thèssõ, dirt, uncleanliness). It derives from PIE *dʰéǵʰōm and is related to Latin humus and Greek χθών.
φὲρω (phèrō, I make, create). It derives from PIE *bʰérō, and is related to Latin ferō, Greek φέρω, and English bear. With its difference from Greek only in the diacritic, it must have made the ancients wonder...
Last but not least, the family. Archaically, they were:
Ignoring length and stress, that puts the Alloscythian word for siste the same as the greek word for luck. I'll need luck if I ever get a sister.
That's all for now, τήρε.
The Alloscythian (other Scythes) language is a conlang that I did a while ago. It is a descendant of PIE, a relatively conservative Satem language, with most changes having affected vowel features (nasals and tone).
Here are some example words:
θὲσσου (thèssõ, dirt, uncleanliness). It derives from PIE *dʰéǵʰōm and is related to Latin humus and Greek χθών.
φὲρω (phèrō, I make, create). It derives from PIE *bʰérō, and is related to Latin ferō, Greek φέρω, and English bear. With its difference from Greek only in the diacritic, it must have made the ancients wonder...
Last but not least, the family. Archaically, they were:
- φετήρ, phetḗr, father;
- μάτηρ, mā́tēr, mother;
- φράτηρ, phrā́tēr, brother;
- συέσωρ, suésōr, sister;
- θυχετήρ, thukhetḗr, daughter;
- συσ, sũs, son;
- and specially, σνυὅς, snuhos, new member (bride/groom/baby/prodigal son);
The -τηρ -tēr ending on everything except sister and son changed those two into συέτηρ suétēr and σύτηρ sṹter. Now that -tēr basically meant family, the -tēr wore off as phetḗr became phe, and tēr became a word of its own meaning: a near relative or close friend.
Ignoring length and stress, that puts the Alloscythian word for siste the same as the greek word for luck. I'll need luck if I ever get a sister.
That's all for now, τήρε.
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Wednesday, February 9, 2011
I did it again
That's right, I did it again. I didn't post on Sunday. I think I'll have to start thinking about my posts much earlier and having them automatically post on Sunday. Today I'll just tell you about Latin Wikipedia, or more appropriately, Vicipædia Latina. It's basically Wikipedia in Latin.
It exists. Valētē!
Sorry about that description. I'm too lazy to do more.
It exists. Valētē!
Sorry about that description. I'm too lazy to do more.
Tuesday, February 1, 2011
MaoEG
Here's your mid-week post.
Medieval-and-on European Genealogy (MaoEG) is a great hobby of mine, especially finding houses. The unofficial genealogical definition of house is a group of people including and only including a person and all those who trace legitimate patrilineal or matrilineal descent to them. I will name houses by their common names, and in inventing my own give the place of birth or place of rule for their founder. Here I'm going to list some important ones.
And by important, I don't mean impact on history, but how many members they had. That's why you won't see the commonly known ones.
Have any with more people? Comment or contact.
Here's some things to know:
Patrilineal
House of Wettin
Founder: Dietrich I von Wettin, 10th Century, 1st generation (duh)
MRCA: Frederick II, Elector of Saxony, 1412 -- 1464, 16th generation
Head: Michael, Prince of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach, 1946 --, 33rd generation
If you look at the names, it looks German right away. Indeed, probably the supermajority of members were German. However, it has some non-Germans too: just look at Queen Elizabeth of the UK. She traces back through Queen Victoria's husband Albert, who was German (duh).
House of Este
Founder: Adalbert of Mainz, 9th/10th Century
MRCA: Ernest I, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg, 1497 -- 1546, 20th generation
Head: Person Confidential, 31st generation
Known more often as the House of Welf, it's founder was Italian, it's MRCA was German, and it has members from across the map. In Britain it was known as the House of Hanover.
It's late MRCA dosen't mean there was a 20-generation line that didn't go anywhere; there were in fact two great branches from 5th generation on, of Welf and of Italian Este, but the Italian Este branch died out 1803.
House of Oldenburg
Founder: Egilmar I, Count of Lerigau, 11th century
MRCA: Frederick I of Denmark and Norway, 1471 -- 1533, 13th generation
Head: Christoph, Prince of Schleswig-Holstein, 1949 --, 27th generation
The early MRCA tells you already that this is a diverse house. It has two main branches: the main Glücksburg branch from the MRCA's older son, and the Holstein-Gottorp branch from his younger son. The Glücksburgs have produced Danish, Norwegian, and Greek monarchs, the consorts of the rulers of UK and Spain (the former meaning that the next king will be Glücksburg), and the Holstein-Gottorps have produced czars in Russia (the Romanovs weren't really Romanovs).
House of Capet
Founder: Robert II, Count of Worms, 770 -- 807
MRCA: Robert II of France, 972 -- 1031, 7th generation
Head: Louis Alphonse, Duke of Anjou, 1974 --, 37th generation
There is a confusion as to the ancestry of Robert of Hesbaye, so I list him here as founder, though there are sources denoting parentage.
As 39 generations have proved, you can't extinguish the House of Capet. It has two main branches, Bourbon and Burgundy, and both are famous throughout history. Need I say more?
Charlemagneering
Charlemagne, as one of the most prominent figures of the dark ages, is the de facto standard dream-ancestor; in other words, you want to trace to him.
As it turns out, the MRCAs of all of these houses trace to him.
To Frederick II, Elector of Saxony:
Medieval-and-on European Genealogy (MaoEG) is a great hobby of mine, especially finding houses. The unofficial genealogical definition of house is a group of people including and only including a person and all those who trace legitimate patrilineal or matrilineal descent to them. I will name houses by their common names, and in inventing my own give the place of birth or place of rule for their founder. Here I'm going to list some important ones.
And by important, I don't mean impact on history, but how many members they had. That's why you won't see the commonly known ones.
Have any with more people? Comment or contact.
Here's some things to know:
- The founder is the person furthest tracable back. The MRCA (Most Recent Common Ancestor) is the person from whom all current members descend. An ancient founder tells you that the house has been important for centuries; an ancient MRCA tells you that the house probably has members all over the place, as it dosen't just consist of a bunch of extinct branches.
- The head is the person most senior descended from the founder via primogeniture.
- Patrilineal means in the male-line, no female interuptions. Matrilineal means the oppisite.
- And I hate branches that are called houses.
Patrilineal
House of Wettin
Founder: Dietrich I von Wettin, 10th Century, 1st generation (duh)
MRCA: Frederick II, Elector of Saxony, 1412 -- 1464, 16th generation
Head: Michael, Prince of Saxe-Weimar-Eisenach, 1946 --, 33rd generation
If you look at the names, it looks German right away. Indeed, probably the supermajority of members were German. However, it has some non-Germans too: just look at Queen Elizabeth of the UK. She traces back through Queen Victoria's husband Albert, who was German (duh).
House of Este
Founder: Adalbert of Mainz, 9th/10th Century
MRCA: Ernest I, Duke of Brunswick-Lüneburg, 1497 -- 1546, 20th generation
Head: Person Confidential, 31st generation
Known more often as the House of Welf, it's founder was Italian, it's MRCA was German, and it has members from across the map. In Britain it was known as the House of Hanover.
It's late MRCA dosen't mean there was a 20-generation line that didn't go anywhere; there were in fact two great branches from 5th generation on, of Welf and of Italian Este, but the Italian Este branch died out 1803.
House of Oldenburg
Founder: Egilmar I, Count of Lerigau, 11th century
MRCA: Frederick I of Denmark and Norway, 1471 -- 1533, 13th generation
Head: Christoph, Prince of Schleswig-Holstein, 1949 --, 27th generation
The early MRCA tells you already that this is a diverse house. It has two main branches: the main Glücksburg branch from the MRCA's older son, and the Holstein-Gottorp branch from his younger son. The Glücksburgs have produced Danish, Norwegian, and Greek monarchs, the consorts of the rulers of UK and Spain (the former meaning that the next king will be Glücksburg), and the Holstein-Gottorps have produced czars in Russia (the Romanovs weren't really Romanovs).
House of Capet
Founder: Robert II, Count of Worms, 770 -- 807
MRCA: Robert II of France, 972 -- 1031, 7th generation
Head: Louis Alphonse, Duke of Anjou, 1974 --, 37th generation
There is a confusion as to the ancestry of Robert of Hesbaye, so I list him here as founder, though there are sources denoting parentage.
As 39 generations have proved, you can't extinguish the House of Capet. It has two main branches, Bourbon and Burgundy, and both are famous throughout history. Need I say more?
Charlemagneering
Charlemagne, as one of the most prominent figures of the dark ages, is the de facto standard dream-ancestor; in other words, you want to trace to him.
As it turns out, the MRCAs of all of these houses trace to him.
To Frederick II, Elector of Saxony:
- Charlemagne, 742 -- 814, m. Hildegard of Vinzgouw
- Louis I of France, 778 -- 840, m. Judith of Bavaria
- Gisela of France, 9th century, m. Eberhard of Friuli
- Ingeltrued of Friuli, 9th century, m. Henry of Franconia
- Hedwiga of Franconia, 9th century, m. Otto I of Saxony
- Henry I of Germany, 876 -- 936, m. Matilda of Ringelheim
- Otto I of Germany, 912 -- 973, m. Edith of Wessex
- Liutgarde, 10th century, m. Conrad, Duke of Lorraine
- Otto I of Carinthia, 10th century, m. Judith of Bavaria
- Henry of Speyer, 10th century, m. Adelaide of Alsace
- Conrad II of Germany, 990 -- 1039, m. Gisela of Swabia
- Henry III of Germany, 1017 -- 1056, m. Agnes of Poitou
- Henry IV of Germany, 1050 -- 1106, m. Bertha of Savoy
- Agnes of Germany, 1072 -- 1143, m. Frederick I of Swabia
- Frederick II of Swabia, 1090 -- 1147, m. Judith of Bavaria
- Frederick I of Germany, 1122 -- 1190, m. Beatrice I of Burgundy
- Henry VI of Germany, 1165 -- 1197, m. Constance of Sicily
- Frederick II of Germany, 1194 -- 1250, m. Isabella of England
- Margaret of Sicily, 1241 -- 1270, m. Albert II of Meissen
- Frederick I of Meissen, 1252 -- 1323, m. Elizabeth of Lobdeburg-Arnshaugk
- Frederick II of Meissen, 1310 -- 1349
- Frederick II of Meissen, 1310 -- 1349, m. Mathilde of Bavaria
- Elisabeth of Meissen, 1329 -- 1375, m. Frederick V of Nuremburg
- Elisabeth of Nuremburg, 1358 -- 1411, m. Rupert II of the Rhine
- Margaret of the Palatinate, 1376 -- 1434, m. Charles II of Lorraine
- Catherine of Lorraine, 1407 -- 1439, m. Jacob of Baden
- Margarete of Baden, 1431 -- 1457, m. Albert III of Brandenburg
- John Cicero, Elector of Brandenburg, 1455 -- 1499, m. Margaret of Thuringia
- Ursula of Brandenburg, 1488 -- 1510, m. Henry V of Mecklenburg-Schwerin
- Sophie of Mecklenburg-Schwerin, 1508 -- 1541, m. Ernest I of Brunswick-Lüneburg
- Frederick II of Meissen, 1310 -- 1349, m. Mathilde of Bavaria
- Elisabeth of Meissen, 1329 -- 1375, m. Frederick V of Nuremburg
- Frederick I of Brandenburg, 1371 -- 1440, m. Elisabeth of Bavaria
- John of Brandenburg, 1406 -- 1464, m. Barbara of Saxe-Wittenberg
- Dorothea of Brandenburg, 1430 -- 1495, m. Christian I of Denmark
- Frederick I of Denmark, 1471 -- 1533
- Henry I of Germany, 876 -- 936, m. Matilda of Ringelheim
- Hedwig of Saxony, 910 -- 965, m. Hugh the Great
- Hugh of France, 939 -- 996, m. Adelaide of Aquitaine
- Robert II of France, 972 -- 1031
Monday, January 31, 2011
Explanations
Sorry I forgot to post yesterday; I went on a computer fast. Hopefully you'll see a mid-week post.
Sunday, January 23, 2011
Matlang, Day 7
Hey y'all, it's back to Matlang.
In our continuing saga, I will start to outline my vision of Matlang grammar.
In English, the essence of the clause is in the verb. Look at the sentence now the whole world had one language and a common speech. The essence is in the verb, have. Everything else describes in detail that action of ownership. Who had, what was had? Everything else is an argument to the verb. I think, with my limited linguistic knowledge, that most languages are that way.
In Matlang, our goal was to create a language based off of principles of Material Logic. The fundamental concept of Material Logic is, in fact, concepts. There is also the principle of substance and accident: Substances are the essential, unchangeable, defining characteristics of a being, while accidents are things applying to it that are unessential and changeable. In other words, heads and modifiers.
But the substances are all nouns.
Therefore, we must in Matlang have clauses be based off of the noun. In the aforementioned sentence, it is the world which is the basis of the sentence.
Let's form a structure of the same sentence in Verb-based and Matlang terms:
Verb-Based
have{world
-the
-whole
|{and|language
-one
|speech
-a
-common
-past
Matlang
world
-the
-whole
-have{{and|language
-one
-past
|speech
-a
-common
-past
-past
I'd like it to have a somewhat head-initial syntax, like world whole have language one speech common.
And for our first five words, they will be nouns:
In our continuing saga, I will start to outline my vision of Matlang grammar.
In English, the essence of the clause is in the verb. Look at the sentence now the whole world had one language and a common speech. The essence is in the verb, have. Everything else describes in detail that action of ownership. Who had, what was had? Everything else is an argument to the verb. I think, with my limited linguistic knowledge, that most languages are that way.
In Matlang, our goal was to create a language based off of principles of Material Logic. The fundamental concept of Material Logic is, in fact, concepts. There is also the principle of substance and accident: Substances are the essential, unchangeable, defining characteristics of a being, while accidents are things applying to it that are unessential and changeable. In other words, heads and modifiers.
But the substances are all nouns.
Therefore, we must in Matlang have clauses be based off of the noun. In the aforementioned sentence, it is the world which is the basis of the sentence.
Let's form a structure of the same sentence in Verb-based and Matlang terms:
Verb-Based
have{world
-the
-whole
|{and|language
-one
|speech
-a
-common
-past
Matlang
world
-the
-whole
-have{{and|language
-one
-past
|speech
-a
-common
-past
-past
I'd like it to have a somewhat head-initial syntax, like world whole have language one speech common.
And for our first five words, they will be nouns:
- Sōcrāt-, Socrates (duh)
- pater-, father, ancestor
- mater-, mother, origin
- phrāter-, brother, friend (informal)
- adelph-, brother, monk (formal)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)